Creating a generation of historical illiterates…

Back in 1979, British science historian James Burke hosted a series on Public Television titled “Connections,” in which he linked a variety of seemingly unconnected inventions and historical happenings to explain how everything from telecommunications to nuclear power came to be.

It was hugely entertaining and informative at the same time.

This year, science historian Steven Johnson has been presenting “How We Got to Now,” also on PBS. Using an approach similar to Burke’s, Johnson connects the technological dots to explain hos even the most modern inventions have their roots in the past, sometimes in the ancient world.

Like Burke (but without the bad leisure suits, the plague of the 1970s), Johnson delivers profound facts about how modern life is rooted in the past in an entertaining way that imparts knowledge so effortlessly that we barely realize he’s been teaching us things we need and ought to know.

The tragic, triumphant winter the Continental Army spent at Valley Forge won’t be among the facts rattling around in the heads of South Dakota public school students, thanks to new history standards recently approved by the state board of education that take effect next school year.

I thought of those two men and their programs this morning when I read a startling and dismaying piece by John Fea, the chair of the History Department at Messiah College in Mechanicsburg, PA and the author of Why Study History?: Reflecting on the Importance of the Past over at the Raw Story web site.

It seems the State of South Dakota has decided their public school students, from kindergarten through high school, will no longer be required to learn about early American history.

The new standards, which take effect next year, eliminate the requirement to teach the first 100 years of U.S. history, which means the Revolution, the Articles of Confederation, the development of the Constitution, slavery, Native People, and all the rest of the history, good and bad, that has accumulated to make us what we are today. Teachers, of course, will be welcome to teach that era of history if they have the time, but the students won’t be tested on it. And as we’ve learned during the past several years, if it doesn’t appear on standardized achievement tests, it’s not going to be taught because more and more of a teacher’s career is based on how students perform on those tests.

I haven’t read what the rationale for this short-sighted and destructive change is, but I’m assuming its bottom line rests on the finances of the situation, as do so many decisions affecting our modern educational system.

Time was, we used to use history as a tool to help us learn from both our successes and our mistakes. Today, what the military likes to call “lessons learned” seem to have been cast aside in favor of ignoring consequences—both good and bad—in favor of relying instead on strongly held beliefs.

It’s a destructive and dismaying trend, and the folks in South Dakota are, unless things change, doomed to producing future generations of citizens with no knowledge of the great errors and great accomplishments that have made the country they live in came to be the way it is today.



Filed under Frustration, People in History, Semi-Current Events

4 responses to “Creating a generation of historical illiterates…

  1. This is upsetting to learn that the foundation of our country, like you said, the good and the bad, is not going to be taught. This will definitely have negative consequences on these students and their futures. I am actually saddened by this news and hope that it will be stopped. Thank you for the information. It was an eye-opener.

    • RAM

      For decades, U.S. historians have criticized Japan for sanitizing their version of the history of World War II. Actions like those of education officials in South Dakota (not to mention the whole Texas textbook selection process train wreck) drastically reduce their credibility when U.S. historians criticize any other country’s decision to water down their own history.

  2. Bert Gray


    From: historyonthefox To: Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 8:17 AM Subject: [New post] Creating a generation of historical illiterates… #yiv7059601656 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv7059601656 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv7059601656 a.yiv7059601656primaryactionlink:link, #yiv7059601656 a.yiv7059601656primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv7059601656 a.yiv7059601656primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv7059601656 a.yiv7059601656primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv7059601656 | RAM posted: “Back in 1979, British science historian James Burke hosted a series on Public Television titled “Connections,” in which he linked a variety of seemingly unconnected inventions and historical happenings to explain how everything from telecommunications to ” | |

  3. Tommy

    I’ve looked over a recent High School history book, after seeing three pages on Rosa Parks and a paragraph on Iwo Jima it’s a wonder this generation is backwards. This is the result of emotional historical writing from the left leaning “educators”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s